UK Health

Devi Sridhar: Meal timing could transform health, scientists say

Eating earlier in the evening improves health markers, a major new analysis of clinical trials has found, challenging the long-held belief that weight and metabolic health depend solely on what and how much we eat.

The meta-analysis, which pooled data from 41 randomised controlled trials involving around 2,200 participants (42% women) aged 19 to 69 over periods of four to 48 weeks, examined the effects of time-restricted eating. Researchers categorised participants by when they finished their last meal: early (before 5pm), mid (between 5pm and 7pm) or late (after 7pm). The results showed that finishing the day’s food earlier – either before 5pm or before 7pm – was linked to significant improvements in body weight, body mass index, body fat percentage, waist circumference, blood pressure and key metabolic markers such as fasting glucose, insulin and triglycerides.

Critically, several of the trials found these benefits occurred even when participants did not reduce their overall calorie intake. “An eating pattern earlier before bedtime has independent positive effects,” the researchers concluded, complicating the straightforward “calories in, calories out” narrative that has dominated dietary advice for decades.

Why timing matters: the body’s internal clock

The biological reasons behind the findings lie in the body’s circadian rhythm – the internal 24-hour clock that regulates nearly every metabolic process. Meal timing aligned with this rhythm promotes efficient digestion and sustained energy, while mistimed food intake, particularly late at night, disrupts it and drives adverse metabolic effects.

Insulin, the hormone that moves sugar from blood into cells, is released most actively between midday and 6pm and at its lowest during sleep. This means the body manages sugar far better earlier in the day. The same meal consumed in the evening causes a higher blood sugar spike than if eaten in the morning. “Quite simply, because of how our hormones are secreted, we have a better handle over food intake in the morning and afternoon, compared with the evening and night,” the analysis notes.

This field, known as chrononutrition, investigates the interplay of circadian rhythms, nutrition and metabolism. During the prolonged fasting window of time-restricted eating, the body shifts from storing fat to mobilising it through fatty acid oxidation and ketone production. Some studies suggest that eating lunch later can even reduce resting metabolic rate, further underscoring the importance of timing.

Early time-restricted eating – finishing by 5pm – consistently produced superior results for body measurements and blood sugar control compared with later eating windows. One study found it led to more pronounced weight loss in young women than delayed eating, and in those performing resistance training it did not compromise muscle thickness or endurance. Another found that individuals who ate before 8:30am exhibited lower blood sugar levels and less insulin resistance, suggesting a potential role in reducing type 2 diabetes risk. However, the same early-window approach did not appear to affect intestinal nutrient absorption, gut transit time or gut microbial composition in one trial.

Practical challenges and what to do

While the science is compelling, the advice collides with the reality of modern life. Eating dinner before 5pm, or even 7pm, can be difficult for those with shift work, long commutes, family obligations or social commitments. Even the author of the analysis, Professor Devi Sridhar – chair of global public health at the University of Edinburgh and a personal trainer – acknowledges the tension. “I sometimes just want a piece of chocolate cake, although I know a fruit salad would be a nutritionally better choice,” she wrote.

Sridhar also warns against the pitfalls of rigid dietary rules. Counting calories and labelling foods as “good” or “bad” can be tedious, unsustainable and, in some cases, tip into disordered eating such as orthorexia – defined by the British Dietetic Association as “a pathological fixation on healthy eating”.

Her practical takeaway is simple: if you are going to have a treat, have it earlier. “I’m not saying have chocolate for breakfast, but I am saying that if you’re going to eat chocolate tomorrow, maybe have it before 5pm when your body’s better primed to deal with it.”

Maribel Lockwoode

Health & Environment Reporter
Maribel Lockwoode is a health and environment reporter based in York, UK. She writes about public health policy, environmental challenges, and wellbeing issues, with a focus on evidence-based reporting and long-term public impact. Her coverage aims to inform readers through balanced analysis and reliable data.
· NHS and healthcare system reporting, environmental legislation tracking, data-driven public health analysis
· NHS policy and waiting lists, mental health services, climate action, wildlife and biodiversity, renewable energy, water quality

Related Articles

Back to top button